Letter: Cost-plus contracting is not the problem
A reader writes that the government's incomplete requirements at the beginning of contract bidding is a problem.
Regarding "McCain wants to end cost-plus contracting"
I could not agree more with the two gentlemen concerning cost plus contracts. I, too, watched the McCain-Obama [presidential] debate and I cringed just about every time McCain talked.
As a retired member of the Air Force and someone who was assigned to the Air Force Flight Test Center for nearly five years and is now employed with a major defense contractor, I can tell you the issue is not with cost-plus contracts but is indeed with the government putting incomplete requirements at the beginning of the contract bidding.
I can't tell you how many times the government has changed or added requirements, usually in the form of capabilities, midstream. I guess they figure the capabilities can be developed, tested and added to the end product at no extra cost, a freebie. The government typically requests a Chevy in the beginning but will add enough extras to make it a Porsche, yet expect to pay for the cost of the Chevy.
McCain needs to do his homework and stop firing from the hip. He may be an OK senator, but I don't think he would be an effective president.
Anonymous
What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.
NEXT STORY: Letter: A fixed price is not the best solution