Interagency panel backs away from proprietary security policy
In a move seen as inevitable, the Clinton administration has dropped its demands for a proprietary federal encryption policy and has proposed allowing agencies greater latitude in choosing offtheshelf solutions from industry. The proposal was made by an interagency working group cochaired by the
In a move seen as inevitable, the Clinton administration has dropped its demands for a proprietary federal encryption policy and has proposed allowing agencies greater latitude in choosing off-the-shelf solutions from industry.
The proposal was made by an interagency working group co-chaired by the National Security Council and the Office of Management and Budget. Called "Enabling Privacy, Commerce, Security and Public Safety in the Global Information Infrastructure," the proposal also suggests that agencies should be able to use a wider range of commercial encryption software than they can today.
"Government can no longer monopolize the state-of-the-art cryptography," according to the proposal. "It is unrealistic to believe that government can produce solutions which keep ahead of today's rapidly changing information technology."
Previously, the administration supported a plan whereby the U.S. government would keep a record of all private encryption keys for law enforcement purposes and would mandate the encryption software to be used. But under the new policy, users could choose their encryption software and keep a set of keys in escrow with a trusted third party rather than the government.
The administration's proposal recommends that the government collaborate with industry to develop a new Federal Information Processing Standard specifying which algorithms and protocols for encryption, key exchange and digital signature functions agencies can use.
The current FIPS is considered out-of-step with industry trends.
"It does look like...there's a real commitment" to allow agencies to use a wider range of encryption products, said one industry source, who asked not to be named. "Once it's set in stone that there is a FIPS, [agencies] won't have to keep waiting and waiting, trying to figure out what they will implement."
NEXT STORY: Supporting risk takers