Records: The More Public, the Better
The concept of public records is one of the underpinnings of a democracy. So what happens when they really become public?
The concept of public records is one of the underpinnings of a democracy.
So what happens when they really become public?
States and cities across the country are raising this question by posting
potentially controversial information online, where it is accessible with
the click of a mouse.
It's almost like asking for trouble.
Government agencies are compelled to make state budgets, meeting minutes
and similar documents available to anyone who asks. It's usually not an
issue, though, because most people are not interested enough to make the
trip to city hall or the statehouse and read through the documents.
The World Wide Web changes these dynamics dramatically. Consider the
Connecticut comptroller's new Web site, a searchable database of information
on state bonds, dating back five years, detailing how the money is being
spent.
Without the Web site, an individual or organization would have to comb
through five years of agendas and minutes from bond commission meetings.
A person had to have a strong vested interest to undertake that time-consuming
task.
Now that same information is accessible to even the casual Web surfer.
People who never before would have bothered to look up the state's bond
records can now deluge the comptroller with questions and complaints.
But Connecticut comptroller Nancy Wyman said she is more concerned that
before now, people had not had easy access to this information. Most projects
being funded are good projects, she said, and people should know that. And
if they do not like something they see, they should raise the issue with
their lawmakers.
Wyman is right on the money.
Granted, putting public records online has the potential to generate
feedback that agencies aren't used to dealing with and may not find useful.
It will take time to adapt age-old political practices to the new venue,
for government and citizens. And agencies must address concerns about inequitable
access to the Internet in the communities they serve.
But the Internet, by dramatically improving access to information, has
the potential to create a better-informed electorate. It's easy to miss
that development when so much attention is being given to e-commerce and
other commercial ventures.
And the interactive nature of a "digital democracy," based on tools
as simple as e-mail and online surveys, could help agencies produce policies
and programs more closely aligned with the interests and the needs of the
communities they serve.
It could really put the "public" in public policy.
John Stein Monroe
Editor
civic.com
NEXT STORY: Export system in overdrive