Initiative is struggling because it lacks point person for day-to-day decision-making, Navy secretary says
AFCEA's Washington, D.C., chapter
The Navy's massive effort to outsource its shore-based information technology infrastructure is struggling because it lacks a single point person to spearhead the project, Navy Secretary Gordon England said, and the Navy will be looking for just such a leader.
"There are some programs that are very difficult to do in Washington, particularly programs that touch different agencies, people with a lot of vested interests," England said during a speech before the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association's Washington, D.C., chapter Jan. 8.
In the corporate world, the chief executive officer of the organization speaks for that organization, makes decisions for that organization, and ultimately is held responsible for the performance of that organization, he said.
"In government, nobody has absolute authority like a CEO does in a company," England said.
"I do not believe you can take a program like [the Navy Marine Corps Intranet] and meet all your objectives, without one single person being the person responsible for decisions day after day on the program," he said. "So we're struggling on NMCI and I think it is a systemic problem we have that is hard to deal with, but we're working it."
England's comments come in the wake of the approval of the fiscal 2002 Defense authorization bill, which calls on England to appoint a program manager whose "sole responsibility is to direct and oversee the program."
Senior Navy officials said that England's comments were in reference to that provision of the DOD authorization bill. Yet many observers are also skeptical that there would be a single person responsible for making all decisions about NMCI, which would seemingly necessitate that Congress, the Office of Management and Budget and the Pentagon give up some oversight authority.
When asked if NMCI will be a model for other similar projects, England said, "It's not the model. I think we're probably paving the way for the model."
NEXT STORY: Homeland security IT spending lags