IT modernization isn't all about tech
More efficient and cost-effective IT often comes down to customer involvement and comfort, according to some IT experts.
Modernizing big federal IT systems isn't really about technology -- it's about solving users' problems effectively, key federal managers said.
"Technology won't solve the problem," said Anna Rigney‐Phillips, chief of financial customer support at the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Financial Services Center. Instead, installing big IT-based support platforms, such as customer relationship management, requires getting user input before those solutions are developed and implemented.
Her opinion was echoed by other federal IT managers who spoke about their modernization efforts at Pegasystems' Government Empowered conference.
Rigney-Phillips, who oversees a call center that serves internal and external VA financial services customers nationwide and is the program manager for its customer service modernization effort, said officials should take the user's experience to heart whenever they seek to modernize customer-facing systems. She added that agencies can no longer afford to have the attitude that "'it's the government, where are customers going to go'" if they don't like a service?
Rick Smith, a program manager at the Justice Department, said customer-centric thinking is integral to developing and implementing IT platforms that make a difference in agency operations. He is overseeing the implementation of a consolidated debt-collection system that tracks and manages debt litigation cases at the department's district offices nationwide.
Understanding what users currently rely on -- or put up with -- is a fundamental part of the modernization process, he said.
For the new data system, he said his team visited U.S. attorneys' offices to see how the current system worked and how users navigated around any quirks or difficulties. "That allowed us to [develop] a basic framework that we're now building on."
Smith said they are creating the debt platform with a combination of agile and waterfall methods. Users of the existing system did not want to abandon what they had, he added, saying that ensuring everyone was comfortable with the new system would take longer than an agile development cycle would allow. He argued that even though people aren't averse to change, there is usually some resistance.
"It's really not about change," he said. "It's about loss. They're afraid of what they're going to lose" when a new system comes online. Therefore, he and his team met with users to discuss how the new system would look compared to the old one and other day-to-day operational details.
NEXT STORY: Analysis paralysis in government?