More encrypted data storage ahead for feds?
By
Frank Konkel
GSA's Day says insider threats call for unencrypting data only when it is actively in use.
Castle Muiderslot in Muiden, Holland, and its moat. (Stock image)
It takes more than a moat to protect a castle, especially if it's made of data.
That's according to Mark Day, acting deputy assistant commissioner of Integrated Technology Services at GSA, who voiced a few interesting sound bites at an Aug. 22 IT procurement forum.
Day, fielding a question about cyber-security at the Lowering the Cost of Government with IT Summit in Washington, D.C., said current cyber efforts are not enough to protect sensitive data across the government. He suggested all such data be encrypted unless it is in use.
Day referenced Army Pvt. Manning, recently sentenced to 35 years in prison for leaking classified documents to Wikileaks, and Edward Snowden, the National Security Agency contractor who divulged classified surveillance secrets to the Guardian and Washington Post newspapers. Both, he noted, were insiders – people against whom the large "moat" of on-premise cyber-security does little to defend.
"Insider threats have always been and will always be one of our primary issues – can you spell Snowden or Manning?" Day said. "If the moat didn't work, let's look at new models beyond the moat and a stack of paper."
Day questioned why data was ever unencrypted "except when it is used on screen," suggesting it be encrypted at all other times, including when it is essentially "at rest." He hinted there would be problems in such a scenario, though he did not divulge what they would be.
Ultimately, Day said existing cyber-security measures may help keep out the bad guys, but only if those bad guys aren't your guys.
"We're doing a lot of work to build moats," Day said.
And the moats aren't working.